TECHNET Archives

May 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
Date:
Fri, 11 May 2012 15:41:01 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Since Inge and Doug pinged me; this is Friday; and there is always an element of truth in what I say: I thought I would pass this along to show you do not suffer alone.
We had a non-procurable part (ceramic resistor network) and I had rejected the alternate. After several meetings concerning placement, testing, signal integrity and the like we came to a plan
I promptly told the team "Thankfully, our resistance to change did not impede our capacitance for success.
Dewey


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2