TECHNET Archives

May 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 May 2012 12:09:42 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Q2: see the report I sent to you
Inge

On 10 May 2012 18:19, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> OK, next question.
>
> In our draft outline, one of the commenters (don't know who) indicated
> "pre-routing operations" as a potential source of contamination, either
> chemical or particulate.
>
> We are not really sure what "pre-routing operations" are.  What would you
> say that refers to and would that step be a contamination source?
>
> Doug Pauls
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2