Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 11 May 2012 17:29:29 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dewey - That's shocking.
Graham N
On 11 May 2012, at 16:41, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) wrote:
> Since Inge and Doug pinged me; this is Friday; and there is always an element of truth in what I say: I thought I would pass this along to show you do not suffer alone.
> We had a non-procurable part (ceramic resistor network) and I had rejected the alternate. After several meetings concerning placement, testing, signal integrity and the like we came to a plan
> I promptly told the team "Thankfully, our resistance to change did not impede our capacitance for success.
> Dewey
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|