TECHNET Archives

April 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Hatano <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Hatano <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:03:12 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Hi Michael,

The "standard" I use was provided from an ICT vendor.
They used +/-0.002"
I have not seen a standard to contradict this, and the method so far has
been to use what has always worked.
Good luck,

Richard Hatano
Tech. Mgr.
Dallas Electronics
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kuczynski, Michael
> (H USA)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 4:16 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Tooling hole tolerance
> 
> All - I'm looking for supporting documentation for;
> 
> the typical tooling hole to tooling hole tolerance.
> 
> I've gone thru IPC-222, 2615, 610 and even defunct D-275 with no luck.
> 
> Typically I specify +/- 0.003in (or 0.076mm) and sometimes +/-0.002in
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> 
> SIEMENS
> Michael Kuczynski     Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.
> Product Eng. II CID   511 Benedict Ave.
> 914-524-3118 (Ph)     Tarrytown, NY 10591
> 914-524-3322 (Fax)    Mail Stop P25-1-C
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2