Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:12:04 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Absolutely in agreement.
________________________________________
From: TechNet [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Julie Silk [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:15 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] 4 Questions: No Clean vs flux Deactivation. Possible Hogwash ???
I don't know the exact products. Any no-clean flux that comes in a bottle, used with a needle tip. I hate when I see those at a no-clean rework station! Many years ago, a company that we purchased had a contract manufacturer that was happily using no-clean flux intended for a wave solder in this way for hand-soldering. Hey, it's no-clean, right? But had puddles of tacky white gunk in the hand-solder or rework locations. We had a massive cleaning effort ahead of us. It's no-clean only after the mild acids are deactivated with heat.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|