TECHNET Archives

April 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 20:23:39 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Can you develop your question so that a slow thinker like me can understand
TMCL 1000 c on QFN8's is very mild, I suppose nothing will happen. I
investigated QFN64's recently. They had passed 100,000 cycles with some few
issues. This was a -55/125 C test.
I think you should tell a little about the assembly, because that's what
decides the result.

Inge

On 2 April 2012 18:55, jonathan noquil <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi All
>
> Need some suggestions on how to handle solderjoint issue (How to tweak to
> pass TMCL1000 cycles- 0 to 100C) on QFN packages ( 5 x 6 x 1.0 mm with 8
> pins).
> Finish is Pure Sn
> Board is 16 layers 3.2 mm, HASL finish.
>
> Does someone had an experience to share?
>
> thanks
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2