TECHNET Archives

April 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karen Capps <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Karen Capps <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (129 lines)
I think you will find for most reputable CM's, we use brokers only as a
very last resort (not to make money on parts).  Typically when we do buy
from Brokers, we have to pay extra for testing to ensure that the parts
are not counterfeit.  We now use the 3-tier broker classification that
lays out what their testing capability is and we usually buy only from
tier A brokers.... there are always exceptions, though.  When wrong, we
end up eating that cost....

Karen Capps
www.teligentems.com


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Phil Nutting
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 1:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] singulation or depanelization of circuit boards

Brokers are a dirty word here.  We only use a very small number of
brokers we have learned are reputable.  All others are avoided at all
costs.

And yes, we have seen questionable parts show up in our product coming
from CMs.  Now more emphasis is having consignment kits rather than
turnkey.

Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gregg Owens
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 12:24 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] singulation or depanelization of circuit boards

Bob:

Unrelated question but...

If CMs are making their money on brokered parts, doesn't this
significantly increase the risk of counterfeit parts being injected into
the customer's end product? Unless they have a well developed and
implemented Counterfeit Part Control Plan.

Gregg

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Kondner
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 8:48 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] singulation or depanelization of circuit boards

Hi Again,

 AML / AVL , good point.

Working / Managing BOMs with spreadsheets, Oh the Horrors, but yes many
folks do it that way.

 Often CMs will "Shop Around" trying to get lower prices, I assume every
nickel they save on parts goes into their margin? How many cheap
suppliers do you want involved?

 Many CMs make most of their money on brokering parts so I am not sure
how that would work out.

Bob K.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 11:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] singulation or depanelization of circuit boards

Bob,

Our production CMs have access to our AML database, they can log right
in and check only projects they are building.  How they match it to
their database, I'm not sure.  In the case of PCB fabs, our fabs would
be unique in their systems anyway.  For Proto CMs, we're only doing a
few dozen at a time, they may not yet even have full documentation.
They often will work from spreadsheets with our AML info added.

Pete

PS: "AML" vs. "AVLl".  We're having that internal misunderstanding now.
I have 6 manufacturers for this relay, I don't care which distributor
gives you the best price.  Supply chain is concerned we have too many
vendors, we really have a few vendors who source from many
manufacturers.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

Note: All the information contained in this e-mail and its attachments
is proprietary to Kaiser Systems, Inc. and it may not be reproduced
without the prior written permission of sender.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately return it to sender and delete
the copy you received.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________


This message and all attachments are intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately at the number listed above.

U.S. export law as contained in the International Traffic In Arms Regulations (ITAR) and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) may be applicable to any technical information submitted with this communication. This technical information is not to be placed in the public domain, exported from the U.S., or given to any foreign person in the U.S., without the prior, specific written authorization of TeligentEMS LLC and the U.S. Department of State or the U.S. Department of Commerce as applicable.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2