TECHNET Archives

March 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:09:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (138 lines)
Okay, 'net is back up. Here are the photos:

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/tracedamage_1.JPG

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/tracedamage_2.JPG

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/tracedamage_3.JPG

http://stevezeva.homestead.com/tracedamage_4.JPG

It looks kinda' like maybe someone wasn't being careful when they were
trimming the leads quite possibly. I've seen nicks in soldermask from
someone trimming leads and letting the point of the cutters come into
contact with the board as they were trimming them.

Or can I ask how the boards were packaged during the last 40-years? Were
they packaged individually, or could it have been that they were packaged
back-to-back in pairs and the damage that you see on the traces is from the
leads of the other board? The little gouges look about the same size as a
lead...

Steve
 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of steve gregory
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 2:24 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Damaged board traces,

Well, I was going to post them, but we've lost our internet here at work...

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:12:09
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>,
        Steve Gregory
	<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [TN] Damaged board traces,

I've got them Pat, positing shortly...

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Goodyear, Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Damaged board traces,

 the mail server stripped the attachments, where do I send them?

pat

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Goodyear, Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 8:20 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Damaged board traces,

Rubs are definitely mechanical in nature.   The leads are not clinched.
Here are a couple of pictures.  

pat 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Gregory [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 4:58 AM
To: 'TechNet E-Mail Forum'; Goodyear, Patrick
Subject: RE: [TN] Damaged board traces,

Wow! 40-year old boards and it's the first time they're being used...I guess
they really are what you would call legacy boards.

Are the leads clinched? Although I don't think it is something with
auto-insertion equipment, but you never know. Can you take a couple of
pictures?

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Goodyear, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 5:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Damaged board traces,

Working on single sided legacy boards, I finding half moon rub marks on the
traces adjacent to pads, about 0.15" (3.5mm) away.    They are  circular in
nature (half moon shape) on the edges of the traces.   Definitely
mechanically made.   These boards are roughly 40 years old and have never
been used.  I'm inspecting them prior to installation.
Anyone know of any OLD process that could make these types of marks.  I have
inspected 4 boards and find the same types of deformation on all of the
boards although not in the same places.

   I suspect the boards were originally hand soldered, as there is no solder
mask on the runs and they are plated with no excess solder clinging to them.

   pat


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2