TECHNET Archives

March 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:40:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
One of the issues, as I understand it, is that control over a given mine can
change from day to day. Now, one could argue that that's the point of all
this -- that the world has an obligation to create some stability for that
region. But from a business perspective, there's simply no way to know which
side mined the minerals on a given day.


Best,

Mike

Mike Buetow
PCD&F/Circuits Assembly
w/m: 617-327-4702
@mikebuetow

PCB CHAT: A new way to engage the experts: www.pcbchat.com

The 2012 CIRCUITS ASSEMBLY Directory of EMS Companies:
circuitsassembly.com/dems


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brian Ellis
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Conflict Minerals

I've been having a wee think about this. Firstly, what is a conflict area?
OK, the DRC has been cited but this is world's primary producer of cobalt
and is also high on the list for copper. According to
http://www.cfr.org/africa/africas-conflict-zones/p14543, Africa alone has 16
conflict zones, some of which are very important producers of minerals,
including fossil fuels. So, if a metal is smelted with energy from a CZ
fossil fuel, where does that lead us? And what about tin?
Colombia springs to mind as an up-and-coming major producer, but there is
also the perpetual conflict between "pirate" alluvial tin ore miners and the
authorities in countries like Indonesia.

Worse than conflict minerals, what about those mined by kids?
http://framework.latimes.com/2011/05/14/in-india-coal-towns-many-miners-are-children/#/0
is related to coal but I wouldn't mind betting that some of the gold on
those connectors you use was mined by kids subjected to mercury or cyanide,
whether from a conflict zone or not.

Then there are minerals from countries with a despotic dictator. Should we
support their use?

Introducing ethical standards into the origin of materials, including
conflict zones, is a bottomless can of worms being opened. If it is to be
considered, it must not stop at countries in conflict but extend to all
non-ethical treatment. This includes transport (most conflictual material is
transported using energy from countries which are not ethical by our western
standards, if only because they deny rights to women).

Where does it logically end?

Brian

On 29/03/2012 15:44, Blair Hogg wrote:
> We have been receiving requests from customers for statements thta our
> products do not have any content of minerals from conflict areas, e.g.
> Congo. Anyone else getting these? How are you handling them?
>
> The point behind this is apparently to avoid providing funding of
> aggressors through the purchase of minerals from areas in conflict. A
> quick glance at this makes it look even worse than RoHS, now it is not
> simply the materials in the components, but from where they originate.
>
> Blair
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2