TECHNET Archives

March 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ahmad, Syed" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ahmad, Syed
Date:
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 07:23:45 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Coming up next: Did you buy it from Target or from Wal-Mart? From Albertsons or Whole Foods?

May be they cannot have UN and federal government stop trade of these items. The governments should know the routes and distributors. I have not looked into this deeply but sure we impede the aggressors a bit but what happens to those laborers who earn their living by digging these things up in appalling conditions? Looks like a complex issue.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Blair Hogg
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Conflict Minerals

We have been receiving requests from customers for statements thta our products do not have any content of minerals from conflict areas, e.g. Congo. Anyone else getting these? How are you handling them? 

The point behind this is apparently to avoid providing funding of aggressors through the purchase of minerals from areas in conflict. A quick glance at this makes it look even worse than RoHS, now it is not simply the materials in the components, but from where they originate. 

Blair


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2