TECHNET Archives

March 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:34:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi Blair,
We've been getting "country of origin" questions about specific components from some of our customers for years, but they've never asked us to connect the dots all the way back to the minerals from countries in conflict. That would be a tough thing to do and kill a lot of trees with all the extra C of C paper shifting back and forth between everyone.

Dale Ritzen, CQA
Quality Manager / ISO Management Representative
___________________________
Austin Manufacturing Services


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Blair Hogg
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Conflict Minerals

We have been receiving requests from customers for statements thta our products do not have any content of minerals from conflict areas, e.g. Congo. Anyone else getting these? How are you handling them? 

The point behind this is apparently to avoid providing funding of aggressors through the purchase of minerals from areas in conflict. A quick glance at this makes it look even worse than RoHS, now it is not simply the materials in the components, but from where they originate. 

Blair

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2