TECHNET Archives

March 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:41:02 -0700
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I'm looking for input on the following plating defect.
 
I observe a plating void that occurs on a Cu plated feature with ENIG finish.    The void goes down to the base material.  The defect is typically .002 diameter.  The feature size is .010 across.  The parts run on a manual plating line and hang on a small plating rack.   
 
The plating engineer believes the root cause of the void is a bubble on the part during plating.  The action plan includes implementing stronger vibration on the part in the plating bath.  
 
I have two questions.  
1.  How much vibration is typically needed to avoid developing a bubble on a part during plating?
2.  For this plating void defect, is it possible that Ni corrosion or other reliability concerns would eventually develop if defective parts escaped?   
 
Thank you,
 
Mark Julstrom

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2