TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:38:15 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
Rich, 

Here is the table from 55110G in JPG format. 

Realizing that Technet will strip this out, if anyone else is interested, 
I can send to Steve Gregory.

Doug Pauls





From:   Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>
Date:   02/16/2012 02:02 PM
Subject:        [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



While I realize that IPC specifically and the industry in general, does 
not support the use of ROSE correlation factors for the various testers, I 
have a need to see the official document that at one time quoted these 
specifically allowed factors.

I took a cursory look though all 230 pages of IPC TR 583 and didn't see 
that table. 

I seem to recall a military specification that had that table. Was it 454? 
28809, 2000?

Does anyone recall?


Rich  Kraszewski / PLEXUS
 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2