TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Glidden, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Glidden, Kevin
Date:
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:06:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
You want MIL-55110


Kevin Glidden
Manufacturing Engineer
Astronics Luminescent Systems Inc.
4 Lucent Drive
Lebanon, NH 03766
(603) 643-7766 x3152

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Kraszewski [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing

While I realize that IPC specifically and the industry in general, does not support the use of ROSE correlation factors for the various testers, I have a need to see the official document that at one time quoted these specifically allowed factors.

I took a cursory look though all 230 pages of IPC TR 583 and didn't see that table. 

I seem to recall a military specification that had that table. Was it 454? 28809, 2000?

Does anyone recall?


Rich  Kraszewski / PLEXUS
 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2