TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:37:23 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Not an answer on your question.
( Actually, I wonder if not one could use silver all over. Many years back
a lot of manufacturers had silver fingers. Together with correctly designed
connector forks, the contact points were gas tight, and there was no
 problem with connection reliability. If the boards will be slided in/out
several times, you need of course thicker silver than the std ImAg.
Wouldn't that be worth a study now when gold is extremly expensive.?)

My two sixpence

Inge



On 10 February 2012 16:48, John Burke <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Having some issues with silver immersion on a board with gold pated
> fingers - anyone having success with this?
>
> Issue apparently is in masking off the gold during the silver process.
>
> John
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2