TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:51:06 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
I've got a slightly off-topic question for Technetters, but I know there is probably a few here that would have a good answer. 

We are looking at creating shorting plates for use in a self check application for our in-circuit test machines. The idea is that we would test resistivity of the test probes through a shorting plate on a periodic basis to determine when we needed to replace the probes in our fixtures. 

I was thinking aluminum, and I don't believe that the small layer of oxide that forms would add significant resistance. The oxide may cause some problems and the plates may need to be specified to have a cleaning process prior to use.  Chromate coatings are non-conductive, and the probe pressure probably won't penetrate the coating in a reliable manner if any at all. A copper clad board with ENIG plating or Au electroplating would probably be better, but cost may be a factor. And since I would need one for every fixture I have to match the physical characteristics of the board I need to be cost conscious while ensuring adequate performance.

So the question is, would the Al oxides adversely affect performance? Would Cu clad FR4 with ENIG plating last long enough as the ENIG is rather thin? Any other ideas?

Thanks,

Blair

ATOM RSS1 RSS2