TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:57:05 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (121 lines)
Pink Lonco? 3355-20. Actually, I preferred the 3355-ST which was similar 
but only 15% solids and no pink dye. Marvellous stuff! Did you know that 
it had as activator glutamic acid hydrochloride? Interesting, because, 
besides its HCl group, it is also an amino acid AND has a carboxylic 
acid group, so it's  a triple-whammy acid as flux! Its sodium salt is 
monosodium glutamate for Chinese Restaurant Syndrome. An excess of 
glutamates has neurobiological effects and may be used to mitigate some 
forms of epilepsy. Glutamic acid is present in almost all animal and 
vegetable proteins.

Brian

On 29/02/2012 13:07, Joyce Koo wrote:
> Pink lonco? It solders everything.  As long as you clean it fast, its a beauty.
> --------------------------
> Sent using BlackBerry
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brian Ellis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 02:48 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [TN] halides in water soluble fluxes
>
> You have roused my curiosity, Phil. What are the parts that can
> withstand halide-free WS fluxes but not halide-containing ones, and why?
> I could understand it for some chemical sensors but optical??? Have you
> discussed this with your parts manufacturer? Does he give a reason for
> eschewing halides or is it aqueous processes that he does not like? What
> is his view on halide-containing rosin fluxes?
>
> Please let me warn you that you would need to re-qualify your process
> because you may find that the halide-free fluxes may be a lot more
> difficult to clean, especially with a DI-water only wash. You may find
> that there may be more corrosive residues on the washed boards.
>
> For me, assuming that my thoughts are justified, using your current
> process with one small modification, perhaps not requiring
> re-qualification, will fill the bill. That is to have a static bath
> containing a chelating neutraliser (not a saponifier) between the
> soldering and cleaning operations. A couple of minutes or so will
> solubilise any heavy metal halides or organic halides and will "kill"
> the excess acidity of any WS flux. I used to recommend Lonco 2051-B-3
> but I think this is no longer available. I think Alpha have one called
> Rinse-Aid and I suppose Kester, Multicore etc. may have equivalents.
>
> Have you thought that many components are supplied with halides galore?
> Component manufacturers often use halide fluxes for tinning their
> products, often with little or even no cleaning. Much tinned copper wire
> uses a zinc chloride/hydrochloric acid flux and the only cleaning is
> running it through a damp sponge followed by a sponge with a waxy substance!
>
> If your components are really sensitive to halide ions, I would say that
> ion chromatography will be an essential part of your qualification
> process, no matter which flux you use.
>
> Finally, have you thought about using your existing process but adding
> the sensitive components by hand, soldering with an evaporative
> halide-free no-clean flux, after cleaning? this may a simple cheap way
> round your problem, especially if the quantities are small.
>
> Brian
>
> PS Inge: Thanks for the plug. The IPC were kind enough to allow me to
> mention the availability of the book on this forum a few months ago but
> I don't want to abuse their hospitality, other than to say there is now
> a download version as well as the hard copy. I'm now the publisher as
> well as the author!
>
>
>
> On 28/02/2012 21:12, Phil Nutting wrote:
>> We have some parts that are sensitive to halides in flux, specifically some thru-hole opto devices.  We are currently using a water soluble flux that contains halides.  In doing some very quick research it looks like the WS fluxes have halides and the NC fluxes do not.
>>
>> Is there a halide free WS flux for lead-free wave soldering (foam application)?
>>
>> We need the WS fluxes because we currently use a DI water only batch wash system.  Washing the boards is mandatory for our applications.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Phil Nutting
>> Design for Manufacturing Engineer
>> Kaiser Systems, Inc.
>> 126 Sohier Road
>> Beverly, MA 01915
>> Phone: 978-922-9300 x1310
>> Fax: 978-922-8374
>> e-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> www.kaisersystems.com<http://www.kaisersystems.com>
>> www.linkedin.com/in/philnutting<http://www.linkedin.com/in/philnutting>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Note: All the information contained in this e-mail and its attachments is proprietary to Kaiser Systems, Inc. and it may not be reproduced without the prior written permission of sender. If you have received this email in error, please immediately return it to sender and delete the copy you received.
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2