TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:53:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Opps,

 Yes I see the reference to wire solder now.

 Still, I would not ask for any "Buy In" when I know the use of Lead Free is just going to be a big problem issue. Maybe if you narrow down the selection to fluxes that will work with your cleaning process.

Bob K.


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nigel Burtt
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 10:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] looking for suggestions for no-clean flux-core PB-free wire solder

No Robert - we are talking about solder wire for hand soldering only as per the subject... not paste or wave solder

Choose some wire samples from the providers meeting your technical criteria and let them suggest which they find best to work with. They will have to live with your decision - it will be better to get their buy-in if they feel involved with the selection process. If they already do the job or similar using lead based solder I guarantee they will find the job more difficult with lead-free whatever wire is chosen


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2