TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:21:23 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (110 lines)
No,no, no, your customer is always "right", except in UK, they go to "left".  

Joyce Koo
Materials Researcher - Materials Interconnect Lab
Research In Motion Limited
Office: (519) 888-7465 79945
Mobile: (226) 220-4760

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Graham Naisbitt
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing

From time to time - the customer may be wrong!

ATB - Graham, 
Sent from my iPhone

On 17 Feb 2012, at 19:53, "Richard Kraszewski" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Understood and points all well taken. 
> 
> Unfortunately, occasionally it takes ~forever to get something written
> into a customer specification and then an act of congress to take it
> out. 
> 
> Again, thanks for the good discussion.  
> 
> Rich Kraszewski
> (920)969-6075
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Naisbitt [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:01 PM
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Richard Kraszewski
> Subject: Re: [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing
> 
> Hi Rich
> 
> Why?
> 
> The whole idea of a correlation factor is nonsense which is why it was
> removed.
> 
> Consider: ALL systems SHOULD be capable of detecting a given amount of
> CALIBRATING solution that is CALIBRATED to a given amount of NaCl
> solution. If they can't detect that solution that has been injected into
> the test chamber that has reached and been tared to "zero", then you
> have a system that is RIRU = Rubbish In Rubbish Out.
> 
> Keep in mind that every degree of temperature change affects the value,
> so keeping everything under really close control is vital to avoid false
> positives or false negatives.
> 
> As said so many times before, this test method is ONLY really suited to
> keep your process under control and every process line will yield a
> different "cleanliness" value.
> 
> In closing - anyone who has asked for the "correlation factor" and are
> unable to grasp this method - direct them to the TechNet archives where
> there are almost acres of print on this topic.
> 
> I hope this helps but will be happy to answer any questions.
> 
> Graham N - Gen3 Systems
> 
> 
> On 16 Feb 2012, at 19:59, Richard Kraszewski wrote:
> 
>> While I realize that IPC specifically and the industry in general,
> does not support the use of ROSE correlation factors for the various
> testers, I have a need to see the official document that at one time
> quoted these specifically allowed factors.
>> 
>> I took a cursory look though all 230 pages of IPC TR 583 and didn't
> see that table. 
>> 
>> I seem to recall a military specification that had that table. Was it
> 454? 28809, 2000?
>> 
>> Does anyone recall?
>> 
>> 
>> Rich  Kraszewski / PLEXUS
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask] 
>> ______________________________________________________________________
> 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2