TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lamar Young <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Lamar Young <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:59:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Perhaps this will work - from 55110G.

Table A–VI lists the equivalence factors for these methods in terms of 
microgram equivalents of sodium chloride per unit area. table A-VI TABLE 
A–VI TABLE A–VI. Equivalence factors. 
Method 
Equivalence factors 
Equivalents of sodium chloride 
Related IPC-TM-650 test method 
Micrograms per square inch 
Micrograms per square cm 
Resistance of solvent extract (ROSE) 
1.00 
10.06 
1.56 
2.3.25 
Omega meter 
1.39 
14.00 
2.20 
2.3.25 
Ionograph 
2.01 
20.00 
3.10 
2.3.25 
Zero ion 
3.68 
37.00 
5.80 
N/A 
ICOM 5000 
2.20 
22.00 
3.40 
N/A 

Lamar Young
Specialty Coating Systems, Inc.
7645 Woodland Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46278
(317) 244-1200 Ext. 276
www.scscoatings.com



From:   Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>
Date:   02/16/2012 03:40 PM
Subject:        Re: [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



Rich, 

Here is the table from 55110G in JPG format. 

Realizing that Technet will strip this out, if anyone else is interested, 
I can send to Steve Gregory.

Doug Pauls





From:   Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>
Date:   02/16/2012 02:02 PM
Subject:        [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



While I realize that IPC specifically and the industry in general, does 
not support the use of ROSE correlation factors for the various testers, I 

have a need to see the official document that at one time quoted these 
specifically allowed factors.

I took a cursory look though all 230 pages of IPC TR 583 and didn't see 
that table. 

I seem to recall a military specification that had that table. Was it 454? 

28809, 2000?

Does anyone recall?


Rich  Kraszewski / PLEXUS
 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2