TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
Date:
Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:42:23 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
What a dichotomy; to make joints gooder, they must get Bader.
Dewey

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David D. Hillman
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] ENIG thickness

Hi folks - George beat me to the punch! Just to add to his good details - 
the majority of the gold embrittlement cases you see published (and many 
of others that are never published) are due to an incorrect soldering 
process. The gold wants to dissolves at 100+ microinches per second but if 
you don't use sufficient soldering heat, dwell time and solder volume, you 
don't allow the gold to distribute itself equally throughout the solder 
joint microstructure. There is also a good paper by the Agilent and Cal 
Poly folks in the 2012 February issue of Journal of Electronic Materials 
(JEM) on the how gold distributes itself in a solder joint when nickel 
plating (just like what we have in ENIG) is present.  The Bader reference 
George mentioned is a must for everyone's files.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]



"Wenger, George M." <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
02/02/2012 10:21 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
"Wenger, George M."     <[log in to unmask]>


To
<[log in to unmask]>
cc

Subject
Re: [TN] ENIG thickness






Victor,

If you go back to Wally Bader's paper that he published in The Welding 
Journal when he was working for AT&T, which I refer to as "The Dissolution 
Bible", you will see that gold dissolves in 450F SnPb solder at a rate of 
117.9 microinches per second.  Therefore the gold on an ENIG plated 
surface with 4 to 5 microinches of gold will be gone in 0.03 to 0.04 
seconds.  I don't think you can realistically make the gold thick enough 
so that it won't be totally consumed in a soldering process.

Regards,
George
George M. Wenger
Senior Principal Reliability / FMA Engineer
Andrew Corporation - Wireless Network Solutions
40 Technology Drive, Warren, NJ 07059
(908) 546-4531 Office (732) 309-8964 Mobile
E-mail: [log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Victor Hernandez
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:38 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] ENIG thickness

Fellow TechNetters:

   At what ENIG thickness will the gold not be totally consumed by the 
soldering process on a connector lead, LF solder joint.   What happens 
when the gold is not consumed.  Will the joint structure be compromised. 
What about the IMC formation.  The SJ strength.

Victor,



ATOM RSS1 RSS2