TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[MANTECH SRS TECHNOLOGIES]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Garcia, Rigo (GSFC-300.0)[MANTECH SRS TECHNOLOGIES] <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:57:27 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
You can just click on the link they gave out and look for the table on page 41.

Rigo

Sr. Quality Assurance Engineer
Workmanship Standards, Code 300 
NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center
Greenbelt, MD  20771
Phone. (301) 286-6129
Fax.       (301) 286-6576

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Victor Hernandez
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:55 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing

I would like to view that tale contents.

Victor

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 2:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing

Rich, 

Here is the table from 55110G in JPG format. 

Realizing that Technet will strip this out, if anyone else is interested, I can send to Steve Gregory.

Doug Pauls





From:   Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>
Date:   02/16/2012 02:02 PM
Subject:        [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



While I realize that IPC specifically and the industry in general, does not support the use of ROSE correlation factors for the various testers, I have a need to see the official document that at one time quoted these specifically allowed factors.

I took a cursory look though all 230 pages of IPC TR 583 and didn't see that table. 

I seem to recall a military specification that had that table. Was it 454? 
28809, 2000?

Does anyone recall?


Rich  Kraszewski / PLEXUS
 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2