IPC-600-6012 Archives

February 2012

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Byrne, Matthew J (US SSA)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:10:32 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3594 bytes) , 6012_Fig3-16.GIF (34 kB)
It does matter if there is contact if it is a BGA via-in-pad.  I think it should have a "contact" requirement of 25 µm, similar to that shown Fig 3-16 from IPC-6012, attached.  But no, I don't know of a specific existing requirement. 

Matt Byrne
607-953-9820
BAE Systems Controls Inc.
Huron Campus, Building 257
1701 North Street, Endicott, NY   13760
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Reid
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 9:11 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [IPC-600-6012] Via Fill on Surface Plate

Well here is my opinion; 

It does not matter if the cap stays on the barrel of the PTH or not
because it is not part of the conductive path. The conductive path is
down the copper foil and electroplated part of the PTH. The cap if
lifted would not cause and open. Until you stick a solder ball or bury
it and put a microvia on a cap it is not part of the circuit. It is not
required to have conductivity. 

If you do not worry about trapped contaminants then, from a practical
point of view, this should be acceptable.

Sincerely,  
Paul Reid 
Program Coordinator  
PWB Interconnect Solutions Inc. 
235 Stafford Rd., West, Unit 103 
Nepean, Ontario Canada, K2H 9C1 
613 596 4244 ext. 229  
Skype paul_reid_pwb 
[log in to unmask] 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wendi
Boger
Sent: February 23, 2012 2:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IPC-600-6012] Via Fill on Surface Plate

Everyone,

   Can I get your option on the attached pictures.  They show via fill
material that has not been sanded as to flush with the surface.  There
is no evidence of separation between copper to fill or copper to copper.
The question is what is the intent of the spec and what criteria should
be used to assess.

Thanks,
Wendi Boger

[cid:[log in to unmask]][cid:[log in to unmask]]
[cid:[log in to unmask]][cid:[log in to unmask]]



________________________________
This communication is for use by the intended recipient(s) only and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding or copying hereof is
strictly prohibited without the express written consent of DDi. If you
have received this communication in error or are not the intended
recipient, you should destroy the message and any attachments or copies,
and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing, or
using any information contained herein. Please inform us of the
erroneous delivery by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2