TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:05:34 -0600
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Mark Larson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Lead to Hole Ratio for Wave and Selective Soldering
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
From:
Mark Larson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 lines) 
the IPC specs, both in designer certification, and 2222

BTW, back in the thru hole days the large company I worked for that had their own specs said hole size over maximum lead size was 14, 11-14 is fairly typical from my experience, as long as it is maximum lead diameter, not nominal

ATOM RSS1 RSS2