TECHNET Archives

January 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:03:52 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (109 lines)
Hi Mei,

You should check the location of the solder balls, if at the center of the
balls or at the pads interfaces.
Do you have less voids by changing process parameters?
Can you perform HASS test to the PCBs
Reuven

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear TechNet Buddies,
>
> My colleague was performing BGA x-ray inspection to 20pcs of the PCBA,
> each of them has a BGA on the board. She observed that all the BGA solder
> balls have high number of multiple solder voids of various sizes within
> each of them. The estimated summation of the solder voids from each ball
> ranges from 20 - 25%. As the voids are within the acceptable value of 25%,
> process manager wanted QC to consider the workmanship as process indicator.
>
> My colleague approached me for advice and being a QC, I decided to
> consider them as reject base on :
>
> (a)    When consulted, Process Manager is not able to determine whether
> such extensive solder voids will have any impact on the PCBA reliability.
>
> (b)   Though the solder voids size/summation are within the 25%, this
> value are observed on every BGA's solder balls, across all the 20 BGAs.
>
> (c)    The PCBAs are Class 3 and to be used on mission critical
> application.
>
> Before QC decision to reject them was communicated, the process engineer
> recall 5 of the PCBA to perform another round of reflow.
>
> Questions :
>
> 1.       Should the above solder voids workmanship be considered as
> "process indicator" or "reject"?
>
> 2.       Is there disposition for workmanship that is classified as
> "process indicator" such as rework or replacement? For me, it should not.
>
> 3.       Since the process engineer recall 5 of them to perform another
> round of reflow, does it not mean he also concur that the workmanship is
> not acceptable?
>
> I am a self-learned QC, so any sharing on this matter will be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> ~wee mei~
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] 847-615-7100
> ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>



--

Best Regards,

*Reuven Rokah*

Mobile: 972-52-60-120-18
Tele-fax: 97239360688
<http://www.rokah-technologies.com/>[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
www.rokah-technologies.com

**
This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains
information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary of Rokah
Technologies. If you have received this transmission in error, please
inform me by e-mail, phone or fax, and then please delete all of the
original files and all other copies exist.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2