Remember HP's frequency counter, big as a washing machine, inside full of
electron tubes, outside panel filled with Nixie tubes..
How many out there know what Wademecum was? I regreat I didn't save a set.of
them. Sylvania, RCA, Mullard, Valvo, Telefunken, Osram, Philips, Siemens,
name them all..
I'll tell you a true story. Raytheon people, if any, may remember. We had
left electron tubes far behind. A modern nose radar used ICs, transistors,
triacs and all other modern stuff. A MIG hit the ground somewhere and the US
air force got it from a allied for analysis of the technical level,
especially the nose radar. We were invited too. The radar was BIG, technical
expertize marvelled. The equipment was taken out and was dismantled. All of
them just stared and stared again. They hoped to see the newest of Sovjet's
technology, but this nose radar was full of electron tubes. Mini tubes.
Hundreds! Not a single micro circuit. Guess why...
Inge
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] What is the future of electronics assembly?
> Yes, I remember while working at Stark Electronics in the 70's that when
> the transistors and ICs were starting to become more popular, all of a
> sudden the old electron tubes became smaller, better quality and much
> cheaper. Part numbers like Sylvania 6AU6, 6AY11, 12DF7, etc. start coming
> back to me, and I remember which ones were power supply, filter, and
> amplifier tubes.
> And my old tube amps always did have a much better tonal quality to them
> than any transistor amp ever did.
> Even up until just recently, the very best hi-end audio amplifiers such as
> Bel Canto still used tubes, albeit cutting edge, not yesterday's
> technology.
> I had a chance to listen to Maria Callas singing through a Bel Canto
> system recently, while there on business. My wife and her sister were with
> me. They both started crying, the music was so beautiful. Both of them
> were trained singers, and they know a good sound system when they hear it.
>
> So, yes, there will always be a market for today's electronics, just as
> there is still a market for yesterday's, because some things simply cannot
> be easily improved.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ahne Oosterhof
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:54 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] What is the future of electronics assembly?
>
> Yes, at some point in time the present day technologies will be replaced
> by new ones. But the new ones have not really shown themselves clearly
> yet.
> When looking at past changes I have noticed that old technologies kind of
> go through a revival stage when the new ones show up. As an example, CRTs
> improved noticeably when flat panel displays started to pop up, but are
> now essentially gone. Vacuum tubes became smaller, as in nuvistors, but
> transistors won.
> Can we expect some noticeable improvements in today's assembly and
> packaging processes before they will also be delegated to the dustbins of
> time?
>
>
> Ahne.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pete
> Sent: 18 January, 2012 7:11 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] What is the future of electronics assembly?
>
> Interesting discussion indeed. I see a lot of predictions about the need
> for legacy work, which will keep people employed. But it's the leading
> edge, new technologies that will make up the bulk of the bulk of the work,
> and profit.
>
> As a PCB designer, I have to approach this from a different perspective.
> I know how to design for the current technology, but once it's designed,
> there's not much legacy work I can count on. How do I design for Occam?
> Or the next idea? Nano technology and graphene could completely change
> the component/solder/copper/laminate structure. PCB design could become
> more like IC design. I don't want to be the guy justy hanging on to old
> tech, I want to be learning and implementing the latest and greatest.
>
> If I'm not one of the ones ready to understand and design the new
> technology, I'll be one of the youngest Wal-Mart greeters in the store.
>
> Pete
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0 To
> unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
> BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
> (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
> Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts:
> send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
> previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives For additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
> ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
