TECHNET Archives

December 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Pete <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:39:34 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Most CAD systems allow you to adjust the soldermask aperture over (or under) size at CAM output.  This lets you change based on the design.  Some designs force you to use a smaller oversize, meaning you need to pay more for a fabricator that can do that for you.  Other designs have more room, you can use a larger opening, and a less expensive fabricator.

Again, I wouldn't recomend adding soldermask apertures to the CAD library.  There's a reason the CAD systems allow you to define them on the fly.

IPC-7351 really is a great "best case scenario" document.  But we rarely get to work in a "best case" world.

And don't let your fabricator change your artwork!  They have to make some process adjustments, but the final result in copper should match the gerbers you gave them.  Give them an inch........

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2