TECHNET Archives

October 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Pete <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:00:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
A couple conversations conveniently converging.......

The QFN question started on the Designer's Council listserver.  More from a designer's point of view than an assembler's.  So the answer there was much more generic, but still had to account for more than just a datasheet.

Paul & Bob are having a discussion about the minute amount of difference in solder paste deformation, depending upon the software used for P&P control.  

From the QFN manufacturer's standpoint, any chance they considered that when proposing their footprint?  Or even could?

Timely for Karen to ask where the data comes from, if not the manufacturer.  Especially timely since she asked it before Paul & Bob made a great point about the many factors the manufacturer can't consider.  And it makes an even better point about another discussion on another thread (more later)

To try to answer Karen - I use IPC-7351B and the calculator software to start.  I can enter some data from my manufacturer into that calculation.  Then I take that info and adjust it based on what we've learned from previous assemblies.  I use some of the information I get from places like this listserver.  Then make some compromises, since the 3 alternate sources for the part have slightly varying dimensions, and now that we no longer assemble in house, it could go to 3 different shops.  All that to come up with something that still requires manufacturing engineering to tweak things like stencils and vacuum release points.  But hopefully I gave them a pattern they could work with.

About that other thread.  PCB Designers are a dying breed.  There's another active thread on another site that is trying to figure out what to do about the trend to not educate or hire PCB designers, instead figuring EE can just press buttons in the PCB design software and make a board pop out.  Management doesn't see this kind of effort, that an EE doesn't have the time or background for, then can't figure out why assembly yields are dropping.  Oh well, as long as I have my job I'll keep trying to do the best I can, subscribing to threads like this, where I can learn about things like vacuum release points.  It takes a villiage, or maybe a cubicle farm.

Sorry for the rant, and Karen, I hope this sort of answers your question.

Peter

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2