TECHNET Archives

August 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
Date:
Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:22:45 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (159 lines)
Phil,

Unfortunately I have been banned from my Lab and research papers [you
invent one little universal solvent (we're still trying to contain it)]
so I can't give the formulas. I will give you this saying of mine "time
wounds all heels". Given that all other things being equal, the
implications are as follows:

*         Forget about the toe fillets

*         Some believe that with Lead-free, heel fillets are over-rated

*         All heel fillets will eventually fail

*         Minimizing stress/strain relationships in the solder
connection = life

*         Height = compliancy = life

*         High ratio of lead length to cross-sectional area = compliancy
= life

*         Ductility is your friend

 

We have tested 160 pin and higher QFPs with Class 2 heel fillets and the
met our 25 year/life reliability requirements.

Dewey 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Phil Bavaro
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 1:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Gull Wing Lead - no heel fillet

 

Hypothetical situation:

 

Gull wing lead, land pattern error, zero heel (also zero toe) fillet.

Hardware would not meet Class 3 workmanship requirements.

 

An equation is being used to decide if the pad to gull wing lead lap

solder joint is adequate to survive the intended thermal cycling

environment.

 

This would have been a question for Werner but I am sure there are

others here who can shed some light on this for me.

 

I know that part of the justification for why we have set our IPC

standards where they are is partly based on years of testing.

 

How could a mathematical calculation such as "Steinberg equation"

justify a lack of Class 3 gull wing lead heel fillet?

 

Any help is appreciated.

 

 

 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

This message and any attachments are solely for the use of the addressee
and may contain L-3 proprietary information that may also be defined as
USG export controlled technical data. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, use or distribution of its content is
prohibited. Please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately
delete this message and any attachments.

 

 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.

For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 

______________________________________________________________________

 

---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2