TECHNET Archives

June 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:36:44 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
That depends (ka-ching):
On the cost of the CCA. (Do you mind eating the scrap cost of a few assemblies with delaminations?)
On the application and reliability requirements of the CCA. (Does your customer think it is a good idea not to pre-bake the CCA prior to rework?)
On the location of the MSD components and,
On the pre-heat method used (will the pre-heat or the fountain heat be applied or transferred to the MSDs?)
On the PWB material slash type (is it fairly robust)? 
On whether or not you care if a few PWBs end up with intermittent trace-to-via connections, or if they open up altogether due to Z-axis expansion from internal moisture outgassing.
On whether it matters or not the CCA develops CAF on the inner layers.

I would never allow that type of rework without pre-baking my CCAs. To me, it’s a no-brainer. I guess it depends on whether you enjoy dealing with some or all of the above.

Read the following:
IPC-HDBK-001 Section 7.3.2 (Drying/Degassing) and Table 7-1 and Table 7-2, which detail why you should pre-bake, and keep in mind the rate of moisture re-absorption into a finished CCA is usually less than a total of 4-5 hours to 90% of its saturated level.
Also refer to IPC 7711/7721 Method 2.5, Baking and Pre-heating Prior to Rework.

Those methods and guidelines were not developed and documented just to be ignored. Many do, only to feel the pain. There is little cost added to bake the CCAs prior to rework except the labor cost to load and unload the oven. That cost is far less than scrapping CCAs out, explaining to the customer why you are late, re-ordering, re-receiving, re-kitting, and re-assembling all of the components lost on the scrapped CCAs.

Why risk it?

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joe Macko
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 12:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] PCB dry-bake requirement for thru hole connector replacement

All,

 

I would like to hear  some comments as well as lessons learned from the
experts concerning the basic requirement to dry-bake populated boards
prior to some thru hole connector replacement. The boards are double
sided and are also populated with numerous SMT components, some of which
are moisture sensitive. Solder alloy is SnPb.

 

Our normal process is to dry-bake "PCBs" prior to reflow and so the
question came up if we should also dry-bake the now populated boards
prior to replacement of some thru hole connectors to prevent potential
damage to the PCB and/or surrounding parts.  The connectors will be
removed and replaced using  either one or a combination of a Selective
Solder machine and\or solder pot. If we were doing a BGA replacement
using a hot air machine, we would dry-bake the populated board.

 

Thanks again for the valuable feedback.

-Joe

 


"This e-mail and any attachments are solely for the use of the addressee and may contain L-3 proprietary information that may also be defined as U.S. Government export controlled technical data. If you are an unintended recipient of this e-mail, use, disclosure or distribution of its content is prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-mail and immediately delete this message."
 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________




---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2