TECHNET Archives

May 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 12 May 2011 16:54:10 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
There are known compatibility issues with some alloys and joint
configurations and in your case you would have determine the unknown ones.
My question to you would be: Why go there?
1) ROHS allows the use of leaded solders for repair of pre ROHS products.
2) Infrastructure [power stations ] is presently excluded from ROHS along
with anything else where high reliability is required  (Aviation, medical,
automotive etc).
3) Suggest that even assuming Pb free solders were environmentally superior
(and some doubt this), in your application the environmental impact of using
Pb-free solders would be negligible and far outweighed by the possible
consequences of unreliable joints. 
Regards
 
 
Mike
ü Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Goodyear, Patrick
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 7:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Repair / Rework on non-in-house RoHS compliant boards

As a technician that does frequent board level repair rework some
questions have come to mind.   While the majority of my work is legacy
i.e. vintage (1968) we will face these concerns in the near future.  The
boards I primarly work on are Nuclear graded Class IE, (high
reliability, seismically qualified, etc.) high dollar boards, typically
in the 3-10g range and are not throw-aways, most have components that
are no longer manufactured. 
I am looking to the industry to find best practices, this is one of the
places that was suggested for posting.   Any help you can give me would
be appreciated. 

With pre RoHS solders most if not all of major manufacturers used 63/37
solders and repair rework was easy, one just used 63/37. 

With the adoption of RoHS controls and the subsequent use of many
different alloys of lead free solders, (at least 6 I know of), the
following comes to mind:
1. Are there compatibility issues mixing between the various alloys of
lead-free employed currently in electronics manufactures?   In strength
and reliability primarly. 
2. How does the technician determine the correct alloy of lead-free
solder to use? 

3. How does the technician determine what alloy was originally used by
the manufacturer? 

4. Will IPC 7711A / 7721A standards be updated to delineate alloy
determination and / or an alternate methods for the complete removal of
lead-free solders and subsequent repair using 63/37 or lead-free alloys?
Pat Goodyear 
Control Technician 
Pacific Gas and Electric Company 
Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant 
PO Box 56 
Avila Beach, CA. 93424 
805-545-4312 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


***This email, its content, and any files transmitted with it, are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return and delete the material from any computer. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

Messages sent via this medium may be subjected to delays, non-delivery, and unauthorized alteration. This email has been prepared using information believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Indium Corporation makes no warranty as to accuracy or completeness. Indium Corporation does not accept responsibility for changes made to this email after it was sent. Any opinions or recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the author. They may be subject to change without notice.***


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2