TECHNET Archives

May 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 31 May 2011 13:58:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
Folks,

   Can someone comment on Table 4-7 ? mark for OSP surface finish with press fit pins of the provided URL link below.


http://www.frontdoor.biz/HowToPCB/HowToPCB-Material.html



Victor,

-----Original Message-----
From: Hernandez, Victor G 
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 9:24 AM
To: Stein, Dan; Nailos, Mary; Ethridge, Steven; Krishnaswamy, Chandra; Gamez, David
Cc: Hernandez, Victor G
Subject: FW: [TN] Pres Fit Pin Technology guideline

Folks,

   See below comments from Jack Olson from IPC on above stated topic with reference to OSP table 4/7 of enclosed URL link.

Victor,

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 8:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Pres Fit Pin Technology guideline

The working draft of IPC-2221 revision B will include a Table 4-7 for Lead-Free surface finishes.

Looking at the most recent draft of this table, I see that Immersion Silver is marked as functional, all others are marked as acceptable except OSP, which has a "?" question mark. I don't know what the question mark means because I missed the conference call where this was discussed, but maybe someone out there knows? I thought you would want to hear about this even though it is not set in stone. Currently it is just a working draft and subject to change.

Look near the bottom of the page of this link (which is also subject to change) to see what I mean:


http://www.frontdoor.biz/HowToPCB/HowToPCB-Material.html


Jack 

.

On Tue, 24 May 2011 10:05:53 -0500, Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Fellow TechNetters:
>
>   What is the consensus on the use of Press Fit Pins insertion into a final surface board finish of OSP or HASL?   Is there a difference in the term Press Fit Pins or Compliance Pins?
>
>Victor,
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2