TECHNET Archives

May 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 May 2011 08:49:09 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
In a former life, our internal specs for hi-rel (professional portable 
equipment) were:
- if over solder mask, not more than 1/3 the distance between adjacent 
conductors
- if not over solder mask, not more than 1/10 the distance between 
adjacent conductors
- not more than 3 acceptable FODs per assembly
As we used acrylic CC, we could retouch rejects by the judicious use of 
solvents, either locally or totally, and respray.

Brian

On 19/05/2011 22:03, Douglas Pauls wrote:
> Good afternoon all,
>
> I have an interesting question to pose to the forum.  An internal debate
> presently rages internally, so I thought I would turn to cool rational
> people (sit down Dewey).
>
> When inspecting conformal coating, one of the things that "may" be
> considered a defect is the presence of Foreign Objects and Debris (FOD),
> which "might" require disposition.
>
> 1.  Is there any guidelines you all use to differentiate FOD in coating
> that requires action (e.g. FOD as a defect), vs. FOD that does not
> (cosmetic only)?
> 2.  If you differentiate bad FOD from doesn't-matter FOD, what criteria do
> you use?
>
> In essence, how much FOD is FOD.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Doug Pauls
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2