TECHNET Archives

March 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:19:14 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (133 lines)
If you guys had not seen this article, I thought you would enjoy it.

See
http://www.jameco.com/jameco/workshop/techtip/smt.html?CID=March11NL3355763&
sp_rid=MTgyNDYwMTE3NzkS1&sp_mid=3355763 

SMT Soldering Nightmare
Submitted by an anonymous Jameco Customer
  
Hi Everyone, 

"I just thought I should share my SMT soldering experience. A particular
chip I wanted to use, specifically a USB-enabled microcontroller, came only
in an SMT package (44 pins at 0.8mm spacing). I wasn't confident, but I
figured I could do this. My iron was old and clumsy, but with careful
application of delicate quantities of solder, lots of flux, and a reel of
wick I thought I could make do. I've done some passive component work in the
past and they came out fine. 

The soldering went okay. Messy, with all the flux and solder bridges between
pins, but with a little more heat, the wick sucked the excess away. Careful
metering showed all the connections were good. I realized that I needed
sharp meter probes for this. The blunt ones are safer, but I needed a sharp
one to be sure I'm on the pad at one end and on the pin at the other. While
I won't try this at home, I've seen a professional use scalpel blades welded
to his meter probes just to get them sharp enough.   

Testing was the key, and I tested for both shorts between pins (most common)
and open connections (they happen too). To fix a bridge, a quick dab of some
more flux, and a bit of wick was an easy fix. I heated it up and watched the
excess solder slurp away. I was careful not to over do it because it's easy
enough to get an open connection instead. With every repair came new testing
to make sure I wasn't going backward. 

Fighting back the nerves after testing, fixing and retesting, I plugged it
in and turned it on! Smoke came out of the chip. Not good, but I guess it
makes for a more interesting story. 

This required more inspection of the board layout and more testing. I found
a few minor concerns that were easy enough to fix. Sadly, however, my
patient died on the table. The chip was no longer working and was pronounced
dead due to a hard short across the power rails. 

To remove the corpse I used a hot air gun, usually used for shrinking
heat-shrink tubing. It runs much hotter than your typical hair-dryer, so
don't use it for that, but for heating things, it works quite well. I
clamped up the board and began directing heat over the chip. Sadly, my
strategy was a bit south of perfection, for my plastic parts (sockets, etc)
began to melt. 

I stopped and regrouped, electing to make myself a heat shield out of
aluminum foil. The foil wraps around the board and covers all the
components, except where I've razored out a little square to clear the
now-dead chip. This worked although the nearby plastic parts still melt a
little, but they were still functional and now had a bit of extra
personality. 

While blowing heat, I lightly pick at the chip with a long sharp awl, and
eventually (this took some time) it popped loose and fell off the board, off
of the table and onto my lap. I was wearing shorts. It was hot and it hurt!
Fortunately, the chip wasn't very large and only left a small souvenir of
the experience. 

The circuit board clamp, however, offered more resistance, and I managed to
singe a couple of fingertips along the way. Now I cleaned off the pads with
more flux and wick, I addressed the board layout concerns, and it was time
to stick down a fresh new chip. It went well with a similar procedure. All
the connections, including the edited ones on the PCB layout, tested out
fine. I cross-checked it with the specification sheet to confirm I had done
it correctly. 

I pulled out my handy little microscope and also did a visual inspection
this time of the solder joints. I was ready to try again. Power connected.
Checked for polarity. All was well, until I turned it on. 

Fizzle. Smoke. Pop. 

Another board was inspected, edited, and provided, in case something was
wrong with the first one. Another chip was installed, with an absolute
minimum of supporting components. 

Fizzle. Smoke. Pop. 

Fortunately I had purchased quite a few of these chips. Much more checking
ensued. On-line designs for similar boards were cross-checked with the chip
spec sheet. The spec sheet was crossed with the schematic. The entire
schematic was carefully metered out with a continuity checker, including
possible shorts. All appeared well. 

But the chips kept going up in smoke. A few more iterations of aluminum foil
and heat-gun work, plus several more hours sticking down and testing more
chips, resulted only in more burnt chips. 

At this point you must be wondering if this story is going to have a happy
ending. Time passed as did the waves of frustration before I was finally
able to establish what may have been the problem. It wasn't a soldering
problem, a circuit board layout issue, personal ESD discharge, the solder or
the flux I used. Then I started to think that maybe it was the soldering
iron itself that was the problem. 

Never missing an opportunity to buy some new gear from my friends at Jameco,
I bought a new iron with a properly grounded tip and a much finer tip at
that. I stuck down yet another chip, and it worked without drawing excessive
current and/or boiling itself. Yes... It seems at the moment it was my
soldering iron that was destroying these things. Further experiments are
still in progress. 

A brief note to all my fellow hobbyists who might want to try SMT work. You
should get an ESD-specified soldering iron for anything more complicated
than surface-mount passive components!"

Gene Felder
[log in to unmask] 





______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2