TECHNET Archives

March 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Post, Scott E" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Post, Scott E
Date:
Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:58:41 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
I doubt a process engineer can help because they likely haven't seen enough cross sections to know what improves standoff and what doesn't. A year or so ago a few of us at work talked about laying out a test board and trying various things (pad size, stencil thickness, overprinting, etc) to see what effects standoff but we never got around to it.  My guess is that none of this would have much effect.  My experience is that when you increase paste volume, either by reducing the pad, increasing the stencil aperture, or increasing the stencil thickness, you end up just changing the shape of the fillet.  It seems like there's a natural joint thickness under the part termination due to bouyancy effects and any excess solder ends up creating a big blob of a fillet.  You might be able to force more standoff by using a really small pad that wouldn't allow fillet formation, but that would create other problems.  This is just my seat of the pants take on it - I could be wrong.

Scott Post
Staff Manufacturing Engineer
P.O.U. 0000-001E-0CTC
2151 E. Lincoln Road
Kokomo, Indiana    46904-9005
765-451-2983 (Phone)
765-451-0287 (FAX)


**************************************************************************************** Note: If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. ****************************************************************************************

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2