Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:17:19 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-cc: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
as you know the test method itself doesnt address it specifically, however
performance specs such as 31032 do.
we may want to add this to our '6012d' discussion items.
31032, section 4.7.6.3 imposes a -65 to +125 C for all materials.
http://www.dscc.dla.mil/Downloads/MilSpec/Docs/MIL-PRF-31032/prf31032ss1.pdf
Joey Rios
PWB & Process Quality Eng'r
Endicott Interconnect Technologies
1093 Clark St.
Endicott, NY 13760
Office: 607-755-5896
Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: IPC-600-6012 <[log in to unmask]>
03/21/2011 12:10 PM
Please respond to
"(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)" <[log in to unmask]>
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
[IPC-600-6012] mixed stack thermal shock temps
Hi everyone,
We are testing product for a 6012 contract, but the product is mixed
Rogers/GF.
6012 Optional Thermal Shock is required, but no other advise is given.
So, in your opinion do we run it at:
-40/85 (GX/GY)
-55/125 (GF)
-65/105 (6018A) ?
I know, ask the end customer, but I'm wondering what the answer is from a
broader industry perspective.
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Mahanna
Robisan Laboratory Inc.
6502 E. 21st Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46219
317-353-6249
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|