TECHNET Archives

February 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:26:44 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Dear All,
 
Until now, I am still very curious about this term "electrical clearance" that is used on the IPC standards. Very often, the standard will says something like "it is acceptable as long as it meets the electrical clearance". As I did not have the IPC standards with me when I right this, allow me to use a scenario to illustrate my query :
 
A digital PCB has some pockets of power and ground area fills with minimum trace width/clearance of say 6mil/6mil (0.15mm/0.15mm) and power trace width of 50mil. During bare board inspection (Class 3 requirement), one of the power trace that run along side of the ground fill, has an excessive copper protrusion that reduce the physical conductor to conductor clearance by 60%. Based on the IPC-A-600, it has violate the conductor to conductor clearance. However, the argument kick-in that it is not a violation and can be acceptable because the remaining clearance of 40% is much larger than the electrical clearance stated in IPC-2221 for that application. Now, how should this be resolved?
 
Thanks and Regards,
~ Wee Mei ~

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2