TECHNET Archives

January 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:06:17 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
IPC-D-356 is not a requirements document. 
It is a description of the test data format.
(and yes, they should stop using ET-652)

Jack

On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 08:23:14 -0500, Steven C Carter 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>If a Bare PCB manufacturer provides a Certificate of Compliance stating that
>the PCB was electrically tested per IPC-ET-652 does meeting this standard by
>default mean that they have also met the requirements of IPC-356? On a
>related subject, should the vendor stop stating they have met ET-652 and
>state that they have met 9252A?
>
>Thanks, Steve

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2