TECHNET Archives

January 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:24:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (164 lines)
Scott,

I had similar experiences with 'outgassing' from the PWB, and some solder
masks when at CTS.  I did not find it related to the flux underfill - only
degree of PWB prep.  I also echo your 'extrusion' observations, but never
had the opportunity to observe trace failures.  My laminates were thin,
however, only on the order of 12-18 mils thick, and subsequently diced into
small segments being only about 1/4 x 3/8"

But on LTCC, or glass - Ye haw!  Slick!!  Even at VERY large die sizes, due
to closer CTE match!

I conceptualize that while the interface between the PWB & first chip may
need to be concerned with PWB 'outgassing', but all subsequent chip to chip
interfaces should be a no brainer.  Would think that pre-filling the
interfaces between the chips would make the over-molding process so very
much easier.

I have not heard much lately either.  Curious to see if there are many
additional comments.

I'm sure that Mike is being careful not to 'toot his own horn', but Ioan can
check in with him.  Maybe he has a few articles/studies which he can share.


Steve Creswick
http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevencreswick







-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Post, Scott E
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 1:03 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] No-flow underfills

I've changed the subject since I'm curious what's going on in the world of
no-flow underfills these days.  I tested several 7 or 8 years ago and was
pleasantly surprised out how robust the assembly process was.  I played with
dispense patterns and volumes and it seemed like no matter what I did I
still got a good solder joint.One downside is the boards had to be pre-baked
to get rid of voids.  This was with SnPb balls and if I had a void spanning
the gap between balls I'd get solder extrusion during thermal cycling that
could lead to a short.  The other problem is that I'd crack outer layer
traces where the underfill fillet met the board.

Have no-flows improved?  Has voiding been reduced to where we don't need to
pre-bake the boards?  Do the voids matter with SAC alloys (does SAC extrude
like SnPb?).  What about thermal cycle life?

Scott Post
P.O.U. 0000-001E-0CTC
2151 E. Lincoln Road
Kokomo, Indiana    46904-9005
765-451-2983 (Phone)
765-451-0287 (FAX)


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Creswick
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Handling of PoP on assembly equipment

Mike,

I've liked the no-flow, or flux-underfills in the past.


Steve Creswick
http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevencreswick




-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Fenner
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Handling of PoP on assembly equipment

Certainly there are fluxes suited to transfer printing - it's a known
technique. Another thought:
I confess it's a while since I paid much attention to the insides of a P&P
machine. But if you have glue dispense that might be suitable for flux
dispense


Regards


Mike



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
****************************************************************************
************ Note: If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
****************************************************************************
************

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2