TECHNET Archives

January 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:58:41 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (131 lines)
Stop that Jim.  I have Hillman signing me up for all kinds of things, he 
does not need assistance.

Like Jim, for much of our coating, we use a 60 mil clearance around 
connectors, precisely due to the wicking that Jim describes.  Way to easy 
to flood the connector.  Machine application is not that much difference 
beween you get much more wicking that way, especially if you spray 
(thinned material wicks more).

Now, this clearance also creates potential failure sites in humidity. What 
I would recommend around connectors is to find a no-flow sealant to 
permanently seal the base of the connectors, then coat up to that sealant. 
 That way you get a continous protective film.  Same consideration if you 
have components you need to seal off.

Doug Pauls



Jim Carlson <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
01/19/2011 03:24 PM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
[log in to unmask]


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: [TN] Conformal Coat vs. Masking






Jack,

Our normal manual clearance is .06", to prevent wicking on any leaded
type of component.  If you have small isolated areas to mask, this will
work.  But if it requires a lot of different components/areas, you will
be driving touch time and intricate masking.  Perhaps Doug Pauls can
provide adequate clearance for automated methods.

Jim Carlson 
Quality/Configuration Manager 
L-3 Communications 
Applied Signal & Image Technology 
443-457-1111 Ext. 238 


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jack Olson
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Conformal Coat vs. Masking

Does anyone know a sensible guideline for how much space to leave
between 
conformal coated areas and other areas that should NOT be coated?

We have some high voltage areas of circuitry that need to be coated,
near other 
connectors and mounting holes that will not be coated. The problem is,
the 
assembler is asking for far more "isolation" than the engineers! 
(might it be a different clearance for manual vs. in-line?) 

Seems like this would be common knowledge, but I just can't find it
anywhere...

thanks,
Jack

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site 
http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional 
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2