TECHNET Archives

January 2011

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:36:04 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (214 lines)
Morning Werner
HNY

May I respectfully question your statement below?

I am a big fan of VPR/Condensation reflow and was instrumental/involved in
its European debut installing the first machines and working with 3m HTC
etc. but even I would not have been quite as unequivocal as you below.

The reduced delta T at peak and inherent temperature limitation are
advantageous and stem from the equilibrium nature of the heating process.
The load independent nature of the process is also important.

However IMHO the real key to successful reflow is controlling the profile
shape rather than peak. VPR is poor in this respect, compared to convection
ovens. 

VPR is not the only equilibrium process, some of the more efficient
Convection machines can also run in equilibrium (easily demonstrated by
leaving a thermocouple from profiler free floating) and being multi-chamber
are much easier to profile than a single chamber VPR machine. 
The natural ramp rate of a saturated VPR process is about 50C/second and
trying to control this to <4C is difficult and compromises some of the VPR
attributes. 

I am trying to setup a small investigation on VPR here in UK with the object
of writing an article or possibly a paper and hopefully will have some more
light to shed.

Meanwhile I would appreciate your comments.

Regards
 
 
Mike
ü Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Trace Widths Entering SMT

 Vapor phase is better than any other heating method for two reasons: (1) no
over-temperature possible, (2) more uniform heating.
Werner

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wed, Jan 12, 2011 10:54 am
Subject: Re: [TN] Trace Widths Entering SMT


No do Carl,



IR or convection do not bring everything at temperature at the same time.
Don't 

know about vapour phase though.



Imbalance is an important cause for tombstoning.



Regards,



Ioan Tempea, ing.

Ingénieur Principal de Fabrication / Senior Manufacturing Engineer

T | 450.967.7100 ext.244

E | [log in to unmask] 

W | www.digico.cc



N'imprimer que si nécessaire - Print only if you must





-----Message d'origine-----

De : Carl VanWormer [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 

Envoyé : January-12-11 10:50 AM

À : [log in to unmask]

Objet : Re: [TN] Trace Widths Entering SMT



Novice question . . .

I was told that the heating imbalance "goes away" in the IR reflow

process, since "the whole thing" has been brought up to temperature at

"the same time".  



Question:  can we "mostly ignore" potential thermal imbalances caused by

asymmetrical traces shape/width for IR reflow process boards?  (or have

I been lied to, again . . .)



Thanks,

Carl



______________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.

For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 

______________________________________________________________________



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums 

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------


 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


***This email, its content, and any files transmitted with it, are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return and delete the material from any computer. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

Messages sent via this medium may be subjected to delays, non-delivery, and unauthorized alteration. This email has been prepared using information believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Indium Corporation makes no warranty as to accuracy or completeness. Indium Corporation does not accept responsibility for changes made to this email after it was sent. Any opinions or recommendations expressed herein are solely those of the author. They may be subject to change without notice.***


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/ContentPage.aspx?Pageid=E-mail-Forums for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2