TECHNET Archives

December 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:22:25 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
We are an OEM and use a single BOM only and Indicate TH, MECH and SMD by 
other means. It seems to me that customers and ISO auditors would have a 
problem with having two BOMs from a revision control perspective.

Leif Erik Laerum



On 11/30/2010 9:30 AM, Smith, Rick wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Engineering currently produces two separate BOM's for a single board assembly, 1 for SMD's and the other for PTH parts which are subsequently entered into the ERP system by Doc Control. Without going into a lot of detail I understand the reasons for the separate BOM's are related to production logistics, routings and cost.
>
> I am told this is typical in the industry for OEM's and would like to either corroborate or debunk this with your responses. I am trying to determine if the 2 BOM system is necessitated by ERP limitations or the result of a misguided approach to process development.
>
> Does anyone use the two BOM approach for a single board assembly?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Rick
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2