TECHNET Archives

December 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 2 Dec 2010 13:16:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (192 lines)
Dave,

 Thank you.

 In my experience with ICT programming it has always been the "Opens" that
were difficult to identify so I tend to concentrate on open failures.

 I buy the argument that not one technique is sufficient to detect a broad
range of issues. But, since no level of inspection will ever replace a good
process I am left with trying to decide which types of inspection/process is
appropriate for a given part style for a given PCB finish. Also, I am
thinking that inspection should help qualify the process and not just as a
connection verification of specific pins on specific components. 

 As a circuit designer I wish to select component styles (when I have a
chance) and PCB finishes (here I have a choice) that will fit into whatever
assembly and inspection process my CM eventually uses. X-Ray seems to be the
most common advanced inspection technique that I find in use though there
are many variations. 

 Is there any difference in how various PCB finishes will influence how well
X-Ray techniques reveal opens or qualify the assembly process?

Thanks Again,
Bob K.


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David D. Hillman
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 12:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] BGA Failure Analysis Recommendations

Hi Bob - maybe just a bit. Today's Xray systems can do some outstanding
assessments but there are some cracks/wetting conditions that a
cross-section is the optimum way of assessment. I think you have touch on
more of a level of expectation versus technique capability for a given
analysis method.

Dave



Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]> Sent by: TechNet
<[log in to unmask]>
12/02/2010 10:54 AM
Please respond to
[log in to unmask]


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: [TN] BGA Failure Analysis Recommendations






Hi,

 I am very interested in how this turns out.

 Here we have a known problem at a known location and neither 2D or 3D 
X-Ray
show the error. Did I get that right?

 This makes me question X-Ray inspection as a general inspection method. 
If
you have a blob of solder under a part sure. But opens seem to be an 
issue?

 Am I overly critical of X- Ray here?

Thanks,
Bob K.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Leland Woodall
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 10:36 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] BGA Failure Analysis Recommendations

Good morning, everyone!

I'm looking for some advice on how to best analyze a BGA problem.  We had 
an
assembly to fail in a reliability test, and have isolated the problem to 
an
intermittent contact on the BGA device.  When downward pressure is applied
to the component it will pass.  Without the pressure, it won't.

That tells me we have either fractured a joint, had a ball to separate 
from
the package, or had a head in pillow (or non-wet) condition.

We don't have a BGA inspection scope in house, and I can only see two of 
the
four outside edges with the equipment I have.  Of course, nothing is wrong
with those.

We have both 2 and 3D xray machines, but neither detect a flawed 
condition.

At this point, do I go with dye and pry, or conduct a series of cross
sections?

What's the recommendations of the pros out there that have dealt with 
this?
Your suggestions are sincerely appreciated!

Leland Woodall

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET 
Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2