TECHNET Archives

November 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, jan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:53:39 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (155 lines)
Any more issue£żI am very interesting with it

Jan

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Mahanna
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 10:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] the reliability of capped vias in pads

The 6012C cap requirements are intended to assure a minimal structural
feature.  As such, IMO wrap continues to be the most important reliability
feature.
If your fabs are laying down 2-4 mil caps that's a different story.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Frank Kimmey
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 10:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] the reliability of capped vias in pads

Bob,
I don't know I can give definitive proof of but I am pretty sure (good
Engineering reference) capped via in pad can be considerably more reliable
in manual rework than standard pad. With the additional copper going through
the board it should give considerably better resistance against thermal
caused pad lift (more surface area to adhere to board, plus pads on both
sides). I would always be more comfortable hand soldering through hole than
SMT. Due to the mechanical definitions of a capped via I would expect
through hole soldering rules may apply better than surface mount. As to your
specific questions, I think those all must be determined internally
depending on your available skill levels and reliability needs.
Sorry I don't have better, maybe Werner will take a break from golf to
answer.
Hope it helps some,
FNK

Frank N Kimmey CID+
Manager - PCB Design
Powerwave Technologies Inc
Mobile - 916-670-0645
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob Landman
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 10:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] the reliability of capped vias in pads

A colleague asked me for information about the reliability of capped vias in
pads:

1)  How many allowed repairs?  

2)  Is it acceptable to hand solder wire lead components on those pads?

3)  How many allowed repairs are allowed for hand soldered component leads
on thes pads?

4)  What is the recommended soldering iron tip temperature?  (for lead-free
and tin/lead solders)

5)  Is the solder tip "touch up" time controlled well enough by the average
repair technican when done manually to be acceptable or is only reflow
soldering recommended (no rework)?

6)  Is the touch up time more variable, longer, when the solder is Lead
Free?  (I would say yes it is and we only use eutectic tin/lead solder on
COTS lead-free boards when we do a repair)

7)  Are there any restrictions on placing a via in a pad if the component
leads are hand soldered to this pad?


Bob Landman
H&L Instruments, LLC



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


Click the following link to report this email as spam:
https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/qH!nOYBWGLfTndxI!oX7UnqIHF!Df9sdND+txh4B0LqwX
nFL7VZ3OVu+S+9PAn+Bjc3yNY2GdwF+s7xSCXkZmg==  

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0 To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2