TECHNET Archives

November 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ong Seet Leng <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ong Seet Leng <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:12:17 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
We use the same BOM for all board assembly. Seems to me to be very
complicated if you have two BOM for the same job. Chances of
misplacement is high.


Regards,
Seet Leng
DSO National Lab.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Smith, Rick
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Separate BOM's for Same Assembly

Hi Folks,

Engineering currently produces two separate BOM's for a single board
assembly, 1 for SMD's and the other for PTH parts which are subsequently
entered into the ERP system by Doc Control. Without going into a lot of
detail I understand the reasons for the separate BOM's are related to
production logistics, routings and cost.

I am told this is typical in the industry for OEM's and would like to
either corroborate or debunk this with your responses. I am trying to
determine if the 2 BOM system is necessitated by ERP limitations or the
result of a misguided approach to process development.

Does anyone use the two BOM approach for a single board assembly?

Thanks!

Regards,
Rick


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2