Bob Landman
H&L Instruments, LLC

=========================

IPC Criticizes Bad Science, Methodology in Greenpeace Electronics Guide


BANNOCKBURN, Ill., USA, November 15, 2010 - IPC - IPC - Association Connecting Electronics IndustriesR <http://www.ipc.org/default.aspx>  is criticizing the "bad science" in the latest revision to Greenpeace's electronics scorecard, "Guide to Greener Electronics."  The guide rates consumer electronics companies against Greenpeace criteria on hazardous substances, take back and recycling, and energy use and climate change. IPC has made the following statement on the Guide:


"Greenpeace continues to mark down leading consumer electronics manufacturers for failing to lobby for an agenda based on faulty science. Several computer manufacturers received lower scores for not aggressively removing brominated flame retardants (BFRs) from their products.

"The science does not support the need to phase out all BFRs. In fact, the World Health Organization and the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks conducted separate, comprehensive scientific assessments of Tetrabromobisphenol-A (TBBPA), a widely used BFR, and both found TBBPA to be safe for human health and the environment.

"In addition, IPC, on behalf of our members, is extremely concerned about Greenpeace's tactics in penalizing companies for 'failing to openly support restrictions on ... brominated flame retardants (BFRs)..' In fact, Greenpeace provides specific wording it would like to see companies use in calling for an expansion of the RoHS Directive to include the ban of BFRs.

"Demonizing certain substances without a scientific basis can lead industries to adopt substances that have a greater environmental impact or that cause resources to be inefficiently used. IPC calls on nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and regulators to adopt scientific principles in the evaluation and banning of any chemicals and substances."

	

Facts on the Greenpeace ranking criteria are available at www.ipc.org/ehs/greenpeace. They include:


Ranking Criteria:     	Substituting harmful chemicals in the production of electronics will prevent worker exposure to these substances and contamination of communities that neighbor production facilities. 
	
Fact:           	The World Health Organization and the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) conducted separate, comprehensive scientific assessments of TBBPA and both found TBBPA to be safe for human health and the environment.	

Fact:	 In Europe, the flame retardant industry's Voluntary Emissions Control Action Programme (VECAP) has reduced manufacturing-related releases of TBBPA to air and water to less than one kilogram total in 2009.
	
Ranking Criteria: 	Eliminating harmful substances will also prevent leaching/offgassing of chemicals like brominated flame retardants (BFR) during use, and enable electronic scrap to be safely recycled.	

Fact:	 TBBPA is chemically bound into the plastic matrix of the printed board and therefore is not chemically available (for leaching or offgassing) during use. 	

Fact:	 Metals are reclaimed from waste printed boards through incineration. Regulated, controlled incineration of bromine- and chlorine-containing materials does not pose a problem for human health or the environment. 	

Ranking Criteria: 	The presence of toxic substances in electronics perpetuates the toxic cycle - during reprocessing of electronic waste and by using contaminated secondary materials to make new products.	

Fact:	 The World Health Organization and the European Commission Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) conducted separate, comprehensive scientific assessments of TBBPA and both found TBBPA to be safe for human health and the environment.	

Fact:	 Current best management of end-of-life circuit boards is energy and metals recovery through controlled incineration. Regulated, controlled incineration of bromine- and chlorine-containing materials does not pose a problem for human health or the environment. 	

Ranking Criteria: 	The issue of toxicity is overarching. Until the use of toxic substances is eliminated, it is impossible to secure "safe" recycling.	

Fact:	 Regulated, controlled incineration of bromine- and chlorine-containing materials does not pose a problem for human health or the environment.	

# # # 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------