We use a single BOM with "phantom" levels (no WO created). This is used to separate/organize the parts into the work cell that uses the parts and assists when picking a kit. We had looked into an "issue point" approach as described below, but it did not function well in our software package so we scrapped it...
Karen H.A. Capps
(850) 539-2500 x257
(850) 539-2509 Fax#
www.teligentems.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Keith Calhoun
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Separate BOM's for Same Assembly
I have never seen the 2 BOM approach, in the various MRP and ERP systems
I have been exposed to we just assigned the parts to different work
cells according to SMT, pre-wave, or post-wave assembly and the system
automatically created the proper pick lists for each assigned point.
For our work instructions the BOM is entered into our system and again
the parts are assigned to the work cell, then they appear at the point
they are installed.
Keith S. Calhoun
Manufacturing Engineering Manager
SoPark Corporation
3300 South Park Avenue
Buffalo, New York 14218
Phone: 716-822-0434 ext. 237
Fax: 716-822-5062
Email: [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Smith, Rick
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Separate BOM's for Same Assembly
Hi Folks,
Engineering currently produces two separate BOM's for a single board
assembly, 1 for SMD's and the other for PTH parts which are subsequently
entered into the ERP system by Doc Control. Without going into a lot of
detail I understand the reasons for the separate BOM's are related to
production logistics, routings and cost.
I am told this is typical in the industry for OEM's and would like to
either corroborate or debunk this with your responses. I am trying to
determine if the 2 BOM system is necessitated by ERP limitations or the
result of a misguided approach to process development.
Does anyone use the two BOM approach for a single board assembly?
Thanks!
Regards,
Rick
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
This message and all attachments are intended for the use of the individual or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately at the number listed above.
U.S. export law as contained in the International Traffic In Arms Regulations (ITAR) and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) may be applicable to any technical information submitted with this communication. This technical information is not to be placed in the public domain, exported from the U.S., or given to any foreign person in the U.S., without the prior, specific written authorization of TeligentEMS LLC and the U.S. Department of State or the U.S. Department of Commerce as applicable.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
