Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:35:10 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Mumtaz,
Each bond results in slightly different deformation geometry of the wire which results in different degrees of stress concentration—thus, differences in the pull strength of these geometries.
What you really need to worry about is where the loading in product is coming from, what is the magnitude of the loading and whether it is steady-state or cyclic loading.
You may want to look in the upcoming December issue of Global SMT & Packaging magazine, where I deal with wire bond fatigue in my reliability column.
Werner
Upcoming workshops:
November 2 & 9, SMTA Webtorial,
“Fundamentals in Solder Joint Reliability”
December 7 & 14, SMTA Webtorial,
“Acceleration Models, Accelerated Reliability Tests and ScreeningProcedures”
-----Original Message-----
From: Mumtaz Bora <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, Nov 12, 2010 9:15 pm
Subject: [TN] Wire Bond Pull failures
Hello TechNetters,
I have some wirebonds on a Hi -Rel package that pulled below 2.0 gm
minimum per Mil -Std -883. I have taken some SEM images of failed and
good bonds. Customer has a concern with plane of fracture of the failed
bonds even though it is break at "neck" . . It is Aluminum wire/to
Aluminum bond pad wedge bonded ultrasonically and aluminum wire to gold
plated post also bonded ultrasonic. Wire pull is post seal. I have
uploaded the file of images on the TechNet groupsite .I will appreciate
some feedback from wirebonding experts on the forum.
http://ipc-technet.groupsite.com/main/summary
<http://ipc-technet.groupsite.com/main/summary>
Thank-you, Mumtaz
Mumtaz Bora
Senior Packaging Engineer
Peregrine Semiconductor
9380 Carroll Park Drive
San Diego, CA 92121
858-795-0112-direct
858-731-9499 -fax
[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|