TECHNET Archives

October 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:11:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Bryon,

It probably varies considerably from company to company. Probably the best 
approach is to understand what your customers / users expect, and how well 
controlled your process are to meet their expectations. If you can produce a 
product that meets expectations, you can safely skip inspection. You would 
probably want to perform inspection a sample basis to verify that the process 
hasn't changed. 

Blair

On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:06:00 -0400, Bryon Boone 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>I understand the requirements within J-STD-001, in reference to COTS.
>
>Can some of you give me the industry consensus in reference to COTS
>inspection/ not to inspect?
>
>Thanks.
>
> 
>
>Bryon
>
> 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2