TECHNET Archives

October 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:03:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
 Hi Kevin,
It is the latter—trace connections to lands only becomes an issue in connection with BGA pad cratering.
Werner

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Glidden, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tue, Oct 5, 2010 3:02 pm
Subject: [TN] PTH reliability - pad to surface trace


I've been reading about PTH reliability, mainly through Paul Reid's articles and 
old TN posts from Werner....

If you have a PTH with a surface trace attached to the top side pad, would there 
be more stress (and thus propensity for cracking / separation between the pad 
and joining trace) at the pad / trace interface area with a smaller or larger 
pad size?

The "pad rotation" pivots about the knee.  A larger pad dia puts the 
pad-to-trace connection further away from the pivot point and thus the interface 
area would be subjected to greater deflection.  Alternately, a smaller pad area 
(I believe 6012 requires .002" min) would have less connecting surface area ???

Or is the pad to trace interconnection not a primary failure mode when compared 
to barrel or corner cracks?

Thanks!

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for 
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2